Re: crypt auth - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: crypt auth
Date
Msg-id 48FC9A9B.1080707@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: crypt auth  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: crypt auth
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> AFAICT, removing an authentication method requires a protocol version 
>> bump.
> 
> Why would it require that?  There would just be some auth method codes
> that remain reserved but aren't used anymore.

Yeah, I was mistaken.  AuthenticationCryptPassword would remain in the 
protocol definition, but the server would just never send it.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: crypt auth
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy