Re: CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink
Date
Msg-id 48EDDA0C.2050705@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> I could be wrong - but couldn't other bad things happen too? If you're 
> copying the files before the checkpoint has completed, couldn't the new 
> database end up with some of the recent changes going missing? Or is 
> that prevented by FlushDatabaseBuffers?

FlushDatabaseBuffers prevents that.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: auto_explain contrib moudle
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink