CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink
Date
Msg-id 10977.1223482135@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: CREATE DATABASE vs delayed table unlink
List pgsql-hackers
The thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-10/msg00031.php
illustrates an undesirable side effect of the recent patch to delay
table file unlinks to the next checkpoint.  What is evidently happening
is that copydir() fetches a block of a directory, and by the time it
arrives at some particular entry in the block, a checkpoint has happened
and that file got removed.  If there are some large files in the
directory then the window for this race condition can be wide.

The only real solution I can see is to replace createdb()'s
FlushDatabaseBuffers call with a full-blown checkpoint.  It's pretty
annoying to do *two* checkpoints in a CREATE DATABASE, but as long as
we're doing this via filesystem-based APIs we probably haven't got much
choice.

Comments?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum and reloptions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum and reloptions