Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
Date
Msg-id 48E21F7C.1070107@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Question for the slow readers: this new FSM scheme being dynamic, it's no 
> longer possible to have table bloat, right?
> (where table bloat is full of dead-for-any-transaction tuples, and you have to 
> CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL to be able to reuse the space it takes)

No, it didn't change that. Regular VACUUMing or autovacuum is still needed.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends