Re: Slony vs Longiste - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jason Long
Subject Re: Slony vs Longiste
Date
Msg-id 48DA6C09.90609@supernovasoftware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slony vs Longiste  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Slony vs Longiste
List pgsql-general
Richard Huxton wrote:
Jason Long wrote: 
I need to set up master vs slave replication.

My use case is quite simple.  I need to back up a small but fairly
complex(30 MB data, 175 tables) DB remotely over T1 and be able to
switch to that if the main server fails.  The switch can even be a
script run manually.

Can someone either comment in as much detail as possible or point me to
a comparison of Slony vs Longiste.  Or some other option I have not
heard of?   
Three questions you need to ask yourself.
1. How heavily updated is the database?
2. How often do you change the database's schema?
3. Are there other databases in the installation?

If #1 is "very heavy" then you'll want to do some testing with any
solution you use.

If #2 is "a lot" then you'll want to consider WAL shipping as mentioned
below. Slony can handle schema changes, but you'll need to process them
through its own script. I'm afraid I can't comment on Londiste.

If you just want a backup and the answer to #3 is no, look at WAL
shipping (see the various archive_xxx config settings in the manual and
google a bit).
 
From what I read Longiste is easy to set up while I got a quote for
Slony setup for 5-10k.   
Unless your requirements are strange, that seems a little high, even
assuming USD as a currency. Of course, if you want support and
maintenance that will tend to make things mount.
 
The database has 10-20 concurrent users so updates are not very heavy.

The schema changes very frequently.

There are not other databases in the installation.

This quote included initial setup, failure testing, and scripts that were to automate setup and manage the installation.  It did not include support and maintenance.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michelle Konzack
Date:
Subject: Re: PDF Documentation for 8.3?
Next
From: Kevin Hunter
Date:
Subject: Re: PDF Documentation for 8.3?