Re: Binaries vs Source - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Naz
Subject Re: Binaries vs Source
Date
Msg-id 48C6C34B.6020907@mrnaz.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Binaries vs Source  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Binaries vs Source  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Joshua Drake wrote:
 > Oh.. actually I would find it very surprising if compile from source

Given that PG does not do in-place upgrades, I don't see a benefit to
using binary packages. Upgrading a source install is as easy as
upgrading a binary install given you have to do a dump/restore anyway.

Or am I missing something?


- Naz.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: Binaries vs Source
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: famous multi-process architectures