Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]
Date
Msg-id 48BFA818.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>> Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote: 
>      name     | Recommended | Current |  Min  | Default |   Max
> -------------+-------------+---------+-------+---------+---------
>   wal_buffers | 1024kB      | 64kB    | 32 kB | 64 kB   | 2048 MB
Personally, I would take the "Min", "Default", and "Max" to mean what
Greg intends; it's the "Current" one that gives me pause.  The current
value of this connection?  The value that a new connection will
currently get?  The value which new connections will get after a
reload with the current conf file?  The value which new connections
will get after a restart with the current conf file?  I can understand
how someone would take one of these four values to be what is meant by
"Default", though.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code