Re: Large number of tables slow insert - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From dforum
Subject Re: Large number of tables slow insert
Date
Msg-id 48B170B2.9000401@vieonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large number of tables slow insert  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
hello to all,

I've a question regarding the folowing comments.

How to estimate vacuum aggressiveness ?

It's for me very deficulte to setup the autovaccum setting correctly. It
seems for me that it is not enough aggressive, but when I change the
settings the autovacuum process is almost always running.

So how to setup it, for around 40000 insert, update, delete per 5 minutes

regards

david
Scott Marlowe a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> 1 table contains about 5 indexes : timestamp, one for each sensor type - 3,
>> and one for packet counting (measures packet dropping)
>> (I reckon that this is quite heavy, but a least the timestamp and the values
>> are really usefull)
>>
>
> But what's the update rate on these indexes and tables?  I'm wondering
> if you're not vacuuming aggresively enough to keep up with bursty
> update patterns
>
>


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Loic Petit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert
Next
From: DiezelMax
Date:
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert