Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it says is
>> that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The other ones they
>> claim support for don't work [well/at all] with the post-review tool.
> Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we want,
> but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn mirror?
Synchronization problems scare me.
The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to
rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS. Hey, it's
an open source project, right?
regards, tom lane
