Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date
Msg-id 200802072029.51468.dfontaine@hi-media.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le Thursday 07 February 2008 17:19:26 Tom Lane, vous avez écrit :
> > Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we
> > want, but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn
> > mirror?
>
> Synchronization problems scare me.

AIUI we're talking about one way synchronization (from CVS to SVN) only, and
that's considering review-board is not able to do CVS directly (which seems
wrong).
The quick doc reading I've made showed a read-only tool at the SCM side ---
the accepted patch won't get commited for you by the tool.

> The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to
> rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS.

Others are pointing it does in fact talk to CVS even if the documentation
about this is... to be written.

Regards,
--
dim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Date:
Subject: Re: configurability of OOM killer
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan