Re: variadic function support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: variadic function support
Date
Msg-id 48601D20.3040106@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: variadic function support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: variadic function support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full
>> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need
>> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really
>> syntactic saccharine).
>>
>
> What would you consider "proper and full support"?
>
>
>

I don't know. But this doesn't feel like it.

I'm not even sure it's possible to so in any sane way alongside overloading.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Database owner installable modules patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout