Re: Overhauling GUCS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date
Msg-id 4849598F.9080800@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> - If we know better values, why don't we set them by default?
> 
> The problem is: better for what?  In particular, I'm uncomfortable with
> any changes in the direction of trying to make Postgres take over the
> entire machine by default.  I'd want some fairly explicit permission
> from the user for that ...

That is where some 80% solution sample config files come in.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS