Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests
Date
Msg-id 48374981.5060207@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>   
>> And I agree that it's strange we haven't seen it before. Could it be a
>> side-effect from something that happened lately, or should we consider
>> it purely random?
>>     
>
> Well, it's possible we have seen it before and ignored it because it
> wasn't reproducible.  It was only the coincidence of two buildfarm
> members showing the failure at the same time that drew my attention.
>
> I think Andrew has the ability to grep the buildfarm history to see
> if we've seen this before.
>
> Another possibility is that we did something that improved performance
> to get us below the threshold where this could happen; though I don't
> recall anything very likely.
>
>             rega
>   

I can't find any other similar failures recently in the buildfarm history.

One data point: the _bat buildfarm members are running on Windows under 
VMWare, so their clocks might not be very true.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Vishal Mailinglist"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Error while executing pg_dump "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293"
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: keyword list/ecpg