-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, December 16, 2007 08:09:42 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> One idea would be to list the core members at the top in one sentence,
>> and have their details below. But maybe core-at-the-top is the best of
>> our possible options.
>
> My impression is that core (in general) is a little sensitive about their
> position on that page. I didn't care enough to make the argument one way or
> another because I know that core is subject to the community.
>
> However, your point is also valid in that the current representation makes it
> look like core is somehow the key to the kingdom, which is certainly not true.
>
> I do not wish to detract from the importance of core either though. Part of
> me thinks the page should look like this:
>
> Core (link to page with core members)
> * Definition of core, purpose etc....
> Major Contributors (link to page with Major Contributors and Contributors)
>
> * Definition
> Contributors
>
> * Definition
> Hackers Emeritus (Link to page with Hackers Emeritus and Past Contributors)
>
> * Definition
> Past Contributors
I like the 'Link to listing' idea myself ... keeps that main page 'nice and
short' ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD4DBQFHZXzZ4QvfyHIvDvMRAi20AJdKxZVgsHB7edd+Gc9OELrxYzjwAKCyGV/J
y52n7D9rOxuYXjozVjDAHA==
=H2sr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
