David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 07:49:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>> But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no?
>>>>
>>> Not in this patch.
>>>
>> Hmmm ... given that a long list of enum members would bloat the
>> output quite a lot, I think I'd vote for putting it in \dT+.
>>
>
> Here's one where it's only in \dT+
>
>
Yeah. Committed.
cheers
andrew
