Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date
Msg-id 4800a657-ebea-740c-5f2f-d5b096012a25@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-06-21 Tu 17:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-06-21 17:11:33 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I and a couple of colleagues have looked it over. As far as it goes the
>> json fix looks kosher to me. I'll play with it some more.
> Cool.
>
> Any chance you could look at fixing the "structure" of the generated
> expression "program". The recursive ExecEvalExpr() calls are really not ok...
>

Yes, but I don't guarantee to have a fix in time for Beta2.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 2 release
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add header support to text format and matching feature