Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date
Msg-id 20220621212516.2rf4ys2sa7vingsi@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-06-21 17:11:33 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I and a couple of colleagues have looked it over. As far as it goes the
> json fix looks kosher to me. I'll play with it some more.

Cool.

Any chance you could look at fixing the "structure" of the generated
expression "program". The recursive ExecEvalExpr() calls are really not ok...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 2 release