Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Euler Taveira
Subject Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date
Msg-id 47eda150-4789-da62-315a-35a9eda9cebc@timbira.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26-08-2016 09:25, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 21:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> In short, with the current names, sometimes users think that pg_xlog
>> and pg_clog are just logs. And so it is fine to delete them to free up
>> space, corrupting their cluster, because they are just *logs*.
> 
> ...and we also have "pg_logical", that includes a "log" keyword already...
> 
"clog" and "xlog" is almost "log"; "logical" is not. I don't imagine
people confusing "logical" meaning "log".


--   Euler Taveira                   Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/  PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento,
Suporte24x7 e Treinamento
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog