Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Date
Msg-id 47F3F5FA.2070301@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
modules  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> There is clearly work that could/should be done to improve it, such
> as having better system support for packages or modules or whatever
> you want to call them; and maybe we also need some marketing-type
> work to encourage people such as hosting companies to allow access
> to non-core packages.  
>     
>   

Funny you should mention that. I was just thinking the other day that I 
needed to re-raise the question of getting rid of contrib, which has 
long been a horrible misnomer, and calling its contents "The PostgreSQL 
Standard Modules". Maybe we could rename the directory "modules". IIRC 
that was the consensus name last time this topic was discussed.

We've already vastly improved their usefulness by adding documentation. 
Let's take the next jump and start advertising them as exemplars of our 
extensibility.

cheers

andrew






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3