Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date
Msg-id 47F199F6.8000504@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [JDBC] Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> The main reason I wanted to make some noise about this is to find out
> if anyone is actually trying to call eval_const_expressions (or
> relation_excluded_by_constraints, which it turned out needed to change
> also) from 8.3 add-on code.  If anyone squawks we could think about a
> faster update ...
>
>
>

That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read
this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely
users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best
to fix it ASAP, ISTM.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Connection to PostgreSQL Using Certificate: Wrong Permissions on Private Key File