Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> That would explain a contiguous range of messages that were not indexed,
>>> but is that what we have?
>
>> Looking at the debug output, the messages that were missed were all contiguous:
>
> OK, that seems to support your theory. Might as well go ahead and
> reindex. +1 for getting some monitoring in there somewhere.
yeah we will work on that and add some new ones to our current list of
354 active checks ;-)
Stefan
