"Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> That would explain a contiguous range of messages that were not indexed,
>> but is that what we have?
> Looking at the debug output, the messages that were missed were all contiguous:
OK, that seems to support your theory. Might as well go ahead and
reindex. +1 for getting some monitoring in there somewhere.
regards, tom lane
