I dont think my earlier message got through..
We use separate lookup tables for 825 and 83 based on the respective
lwlock.h for that version.
-Jignesh
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:29 +0100, Staale Smedseng wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> I am wondering if the waits are being
>>> attributed to the right locks --- I remember such an error in a previous
>>> set of dtrace results, and some of the other details such as claiming
>>> shared lock delays but no exclusive lock delays for FirstLockMgrLock
>>> seem less than credible as well.
>>>
>> Good catch. We've checked the DTrace scripts against the respective
>> versions of lwlock.h, and the FirstLockMgrLock is off (this is actually
>> the results for FirstBufMappingLock).
>>
>
> I just realised you are using a lookup to get the text for the name of
> the lock. You used the same lookup table for both releases?
>
>
