Re: Why are we waiting? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Why are we waiting?
Date
Msg-id 1202404377.4247.6.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why are we waiting?  (Staale Smedseng <Staale.Smedseng@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: Why are we waiting?  ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>)
Re: Why are we waiting?  (Staale Smedseng <Staale.Smedseng@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:29 +0100, Staale Smedseng wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am wondering if the waits are being
> > attributed to the right locks --- I remember such an error in a previous
> > set of dtrace results, and some of the other details such as claiming
> > shared lock delays but no exclusive lock delays for FirstLockMgrLock
> > seem less than credible as well.
> 
> Good catch. We've checked the DTrace scripts against the respective
> versions of lwlock.h, and the FirstLockMgrLock is off (this is actually
> the results for FirstBufMappingLock). 

I just realised you are using a lookup to get the text for the name of
the lock. You used the same lookup table for both releases?

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan