Suresh Gupta VG wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> As per your suggestion, if we remove =93CREATE FUNCTION=94 statement, we=
=20
> cannot use that function.
>
> Actually, we need this feature.
>
> Can you pls suggest some url or docs to help us in developing the=20
> c-language code to rectify this as we had done earlier for pgsql7.4.2.
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/xfunc-c.html
again, this isn't a postgres bug. you're posting this on the wrong list.
