Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please review the following changes, patch is also attached:
>>>>
>>>> http://69.34.217.90/about/sponsors
>>> Getting back to this one...
>>>
>>> Is there any reason we should group this by country at all? Today we
>>> group by country without showing it, which is the worst possible
>>> combination, IMHO. JD's patch changes it so we properly show that we're
>>> grouping it by country. But why *are* we grouping it my country in the
>>> first place? This is sponsors to the Global Development Group, why do we
>>> care about what country they're in that much? I think we should just
>>> re-order them alphabetically, and keep the country column where it is
>>> now (when it's ordered alphabetically, it makes sense to keep it
>>> there)...
>>
>> +1
>
> I am fine with that as well. My patch was only to create a logical order
> based on the current sort. Obviously alphabetical makes more sense as a
> whole and I am 100% behind that.
>
> Would you like me to submit a patch for that or will you handle it?
If you have the time, please do.
//Magnus
