Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Date
Msg-id 47596FFE.9090903@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules
>> was to e-mail the author.  If people think that we've reached a standard
>> that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the
>> general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information.  I'm
>> not so sure myself.
>
> I do not think that we should encourage people to mail the authors first
> rather than pgsql-bugs.  For one thing, a lot of those addresses are
> dead, and some of the ones that aren't don't respond especially fast.
>
> If the community-at-large can't handle a bug, we certainly have enough
> institutional memory to try to contact the original author, even if that
> address isn't in the SGML docs.
>

Perhaps the at a minimum the email goes in the commit?

Joshua D. Drake


>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible PostgreSQL 8.3beta4 bug with MD5 authentication in psql?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?