Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance)
Date
Msg-id 4752.1176836697@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Steve wrote:
>> So I'd say as far as I can tell with my application and my
>> dataset, this change is solid and an obvious improvement.

> Maybe it would be interesting to see in detail those cases that got a
> bit slower, to further tweak the heuristic if necessary.  Is the extra
> time, time spent in planning or in execution?

Since there doesn't seem to be vast interest out there in testing this
further, I'm going to go ahead and apply the patch to get it out of my
working directory.  We can always tweak it more later if new info
surfaces.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum