Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> I should make it clear that I do not believe that is JD/Command Prompt's
>> intention - JD has stated a number of times that they follow the more
>> liberal interpretation.
>
> So what exactly is this argument about, then?
The reason why (imho) psqlODBC should be listed more prominently on the
website than the CommandPrompt driver. Licencing came into it because I
pointed out there is confusion over the appropriateness of the GPL for
an ODBC driver due to the way the linking/runtime loading happens.
/D
