Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case

From: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: ,
Msg-id: 472ED818.8050404@postgresql.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan)
List: pgsql-www

Tree view

Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Simon Riggs, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Peter Eisentraut, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kevin Hunter, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
               Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
                Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
                 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Bruce Momjian, )
          Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
           Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
            Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )

Chander Ganesan wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> If we want to do something like that it needs to be done properly by
>> (for example) pre-defining some set categories to ensure we list things
>> appropriately.
>>   
> We could fund the change...OTG is willing to foot the bill (assuming we
> get an estimate of cost in advance) , or make a sizable SPI contribution
> (say $1000?) .  I agree this is the best way to go...

That won't fix my own lack of time, but someone might be interested in
taking a look.

/D



pgsql-www by date:

From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case