Re: Training events policy ... first test case

From: Dave Page
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: ,
Msg-id: 472DE1F4.4010601@postgresql.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane)
Responses: Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page)
List: pgsql-www

Tree view

Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Simon Riggs, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Peter Eisentraut, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kevin Hunter, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
               Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
                Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
                 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Bruce Momjian, )
          Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
           Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
            Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )

Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Hunter <> writes:
>> Or perhaps:
> 
>> In the next six months, there are <link>21 events</link> in 4 countries
>> from 13 different companies.
> 
> +1, especially if the number of companies is noticeably more than
> three-or-four.

Grr - the companies bit was the part that took all the time :-)

The way it is now, it will never name more than three companies, of 
which it will pull the names randomly from the upcoming events.

I think it's useful to keep the companies names there as it will give 
people more of an impression of the range of different training 
providers available. I'll play with the wording and layout later (maybe 
tomorrow) and see if I can address the general concern that it looks too 
'blocky'.

If that doesn't work, I'll back it off to just the count.

/D



pgsql-www by date:

From: Chander Ganesan
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case