Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>> I haven't noticed, but haven't been watchign for it ... can you send me full
>> headers of one such affected? This one here seemed to be 'within minutes' :(
>
> Here's headers from a message I sent to -core today, which had about an
> hour turnaround ...
That one is clearly sitting waiting to go through the hub.org antispam
for about an hour (between 18:33 ADT and 19:35 ADT).
Oh, and the message you sent with this info just took about over 4 hours
to get here, which happens fairly often. Headers from this one:
Received: from mx2.hub.org (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254])by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC910DCC975for
<magnus@hagander.net>;Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:47:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])by mx2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4040A8B2859for
<magnus@hagander.net>;Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:47:46 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA66D9FB96Ffor
<pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;Thu, 1 Nov 2007
01:29:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port
10024)withESMTP id 91423-02-4 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:29:27 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E89FA40Cfor
<pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org>;Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:29:23 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id
lA14TKZJ026670;Thu,1 Nov 2007 00:29:20 -0400 (EDT)
In this case, it took 4 hours to get from postgresql.org to mx2.hub.org,
whereas all other steps were quick. So something's broken in the mail
delivery apart from the antispam.
//Magnus
