Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>
>>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have
>>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion.
>>>
>> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
>>
>
> Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
>
>
No it's not.
Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
stuff after it has been declared?
cheers
andrew
