Re: We aren't a relational database ... ? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: We aren't a relational database ... ?
Date
Msg-id 470A56ED.4030204@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We aren't a relational database ... ?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: We aren't a relational database ... ?
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 07:53:14PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 22:58 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> DDP's is a fascinating, elegant theory, as is Phlogiston theory, but
> there is one little problem: no evidence thus far for either of them
> and much against.

The phlogiston theory (from the Ancient Greek φλογιστόν phlŏgistón
"burnt up," from φλόξ phlóx "fire") is an obsolete scientific theory,
stated initially in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher, whereby in addition
to the classical four elements of the Greeks, there was an additional
fire-like element called “phlogiston” that was contained within
combustible bodies, and released, to lesser or greater degrees, during
combustion. The theory was an attempt to explain oxidation processes,
such as combustion and the rusting of metals.

Wow... you learn something everyday. (source Wikipedia)

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Cheers,
> David.


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHClbtATb/zqfZUUQRAjlhAJ9GG11IlpnHVoqFywOtnXDzEfOlZwCgh7rj
Eq+SBnuxu+vYydEV1+g2uWM=
=2noE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: We aren't a relational database ... ?
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: We aren't a relational database ... ?