Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, another issue this brings up is whether we should reject
>
> regression=# create type footyp as (f2 int);
> CREATE TYPE
> regression=# alter table footyp rename to foobar;
> ALTER TABLE
>
> Currently, since there's no ALTER TYPE RENAME command, this is useful
> functionality and I wouldn't want to forbid it. But if we provide
> ALTER TYPE RENAME then consistency would suggest requiring people to
> use that for composite types.
>
I assume ALTER TYPE RENAME should rename associated relation too, then.
--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
