Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Is that going to cover data coming in via COPY? and parameters for
>> prepared statements?
>>
>
> Those should be checked already --- if not, the right fix is still to
> fix it there, not in per-datatype code. I think we are OK though,
> eg see "need_transcoding" logic in copy.c.
>
Well, a little experimentation shows that we currently are not OK:
in foo.data:
\366\66
utf8test=# \copy xx from foo.data
utf8test=# select encode(t::bytea,'hex') from xx;encode
--------f636
(1 row)
utf8test=# \copy xx to bb.data
utf8test=# \copy xx from bb.data
ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xf636
HINT: This error can also happen if the byte sequence does not match
the encoding expected by the server, which is controlled by
"client_encoding".
CONTEXT: COPY xx, line 1
utf8test=#
BTW, all the foo_recv functions that call pq_getmsgtext or
pq_getmsgstring are thereby calling pg_verify_mbstr already (via
pg_client_to_server). So I am still not 100% convinced that doing the
same directly in the corresponding foo_in functions is such a bad idea.
cheers
andrew
