Tom Lane wrote:
> We've had that hack in there for almost a month now, and no strange
> behaviors have turned up in the buildfarm. So I'm inclined to think
> it has served its purpose, and we should revert it before anyone else
> comes to bogus conclusions about performance. This is particularly
> the case since Andrew has worked up a pg_regress enhancement that would
> let specific buildfarm animals still test the "off" setting if they
> chose.
>
>
>
+1
I will commit the pg_regress change. There are several buildfarm client
changes in the queue - I will add a facility to take advantage of this
and get out a new release of the client.
cheers
andrew
