Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> The people who actually use tsearch2 seem to all have the same opinion ...
>> so I think we can't go too far in the bullet-proofing direction.
>>
Yeah.
>> But I would like a design that is bulletproof in dump/reload scenarios,
>> and I think it's fair to question that aspect of the tsearch2 design
>> because we've seen many reports of people having trouble updating
>> databases that use tsearch2.
>>
>
> Yea, look at the trouble we are having trying to underestand it all.
True. But I wasn't too concerned about the forecast difficulties with
data only dumps. Those fail in plenty of circumstances. It is important
that there is *some* reliable dump/restore/upgrade path, though.
cheers
andrew
