Re: CVS corruption/mistagging? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?
Date
Msg-id 21532.1187148363@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?
Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Great --- launching cvs rtag command now.

Done, and I got a plausible-looking mix of messages like
cvs rtag: Not removing branch tag `REL7_4_STABLE' from `/cvsroot/pgsql/src/tutorial/funcs_new.c,v'.
and a fresh checkout of REL7_4_STABLE now matches what I had locally.
So I think we walked away from that one.

TODO items:

* restrict, or at least log, cvs tag/rtag commands.  Maybe report them
to pgsql-committers.

* I notice that the repository contains some files owned by
no-longer-existent accounts, eg 258 in contrib/btree_gist:

> ls -la
total 460
drwxrwxr-x   6 scrappy  dev   1024 Aug 15 03:00 .
drwxrwxr-x  90 scrappy  dev   2048 Aug 15 03:00 ..
drwxrwxr-x   2 scrappy  dev    512 Apr 20 15:16 Attic
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev   9555 Jun 26 22:05 Makefile,v
-r--r--r--   1 258      dev   5870 Apr 20 16:19 README.btree_gist,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  12033 Aug 15 03:00 btree_bit.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev   9902 Aug 15 03:00 btree_bytea.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10227 Aug 15 03:00 btree_cash.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  11414 Aug 15 03:00 btree_date.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10211 Aug 15 03:00 btree_float4.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10074 Aug 15 03:00 btree_float8.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  33915 Aug 15 03:00 btree_gist.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 258      dev   4325 Apr 20 15:16 btree_gist.h,v
-r--r--r--   1 258      dev  58744 Apr 20 16:19 btree_gist.sql.in,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  14717 Aug 15 03:00 btree_inet.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10234 Aug 15 03:00 btree_int2.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10221 Aug 15 03:00 btree_int4.c,v
-r--r--r--   1 tgl      dev  10235 Aug 15 03:00 btree_int8.c,v

I suppose this is due to Magnus' cleanup of unused committers accounts.
That was a good thing, but for security's sake these files ought to be
chown'd to some existing committer's account.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?