-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
> advocacy list. It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions. I am
> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
> and more focus in emails.
>
> Why does this matter? I have been approached by two sales people in the
> past few days who are subscribed to advocacy and want to help
> PostgreSQL, but they are wondering if the advocacy list is a useful
> place for them to help. If we don't add focus to the discussions, we
> risk losing their involvement in advocating PostgreSQL.
>
> FYI, I don't see anywhere near the same kind of unfocused discussion on
> the other PostgreSQL email lists.
What are you actually proposing?
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGu7l9ATb/zqfZUUQRAmF9AJ9//Ic+eswWBsRYRY0mVinvSAXYUACaAm5o
ybTl0SVDn3cNMsbYLi6rCKA=
=Mz+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
