Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date
Msg-id 46B49A37.1010405@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Dave Page wrote:
>>> and I am reluctant to go that route anyway for public-facing pages
>>> that represent the project via a
>>> postgresql.org address.
>
> I don't see any need to have any public facing pages on a Wiki - are we
> too lazy to write things up for the website when we want to present them
> to the world? It's not like it's difficult to do.
>
> For collaboration work however, the Wiki is important I think - but I
> agree with Greg, we shouldn't need a second one. Can't we have an area
> on the current one with looser permissions?

Agreed. The whole idea behind a wiki is "reasonably loose permissions",
right? AS Greg already suggested, perhaps we just need a "better way"
for people to request permissions? (For example, right now it just says
"contact greg or neil", but it doesn't tell you how - not even an email
address...)

And a structure of the wiki that has a section for advocacy of course -
but we already have that.

/Magnus


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki