Josh Berkus wrote:
> JD,
>
>> A. Command Prompt has physical access to its location
>> B. Command Prompt has tons of bandwidth
>> C. Command Prompt has power
>> D. Command Prompt has proven a reliable provider
>> E. Command Prompt loves the PostgreSQL community ;)
>> F. We would probably have to charge a bit for power cause we are talking
>> about some serious machines.
>> G. We are close to Mark Wong as well
>
> OK, I'm sold, barring objections from the donors. Anyone?
>
How much of Command Prompt have access to the location? We've been
waiting for a number of weeks to get the new pgFoundry machine plugged
in and switched on because only JD had access to the DC and he was busy
preparing for OSCON.
I don't object in principle, I'd just like some reassurance that we
won't see the perf machines lying idle or awaiting maintenance for the
same or similar reasons.
Regards, Dave
