Derek Rodner wrote:
> Second, let's talk about the "up to 200% faster" claim. I stand behind
> this statement 100%.
I so expected you to say "I stand behind this statement up to 100%".
> After all, they are my words. And, remember, as Bruce said,
> it is marketing ... So, in some very real cases, we ARE faster
> than PostgreSQL.
Seems an amusing & fair thing to do would be if the next
PostgreSQL community press release says:
"PostgreSQL 8.X - up to 200% faster than EnterpriseDB".
