Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> So maybe this does not make much sense in normal operation, thus not
> applicable to what Josh Berkus is reporting.
>
> However I was talking to Josh Drake yesterday and he told me that
> pg_dump was spending some significant amount of time in LOCK TABLE when
> there are lots of tables (say 300k).
Less, 128k
Joshua D. Drake
>