Re: pgindent fixups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgindent fixups
Date
Msg-id 4676.1462289799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent fixups  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing
>> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved.

> OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which
> I think is a bummer, but oh well.

pgindent is reliable enough that I'm not really worried about running
it post-beta.  Obviously sooner is better than later, to give authors
of 9.7 patches more time to rebase; but I do not think we should give
ourselves extra work just to do it a little sooner.

> There are a lot more than 2 patchsets that are busted at the moment,
> unfortunately, but I assume you are referring to "snapshot too old"
> and "Use Foreign Key relationships to infer multi-column join
> selectivity".

Yeah, those are the ones I'm thinking of.  I've not heard serious
proposals to revert any others, have you?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent fixups
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <