On 2016-05-02 10:32:28 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> You are certainly welcome to add a new open item to cover those
> complaints.
Done that.
> But I do not want to blur together the discussion of
> whether the feature is well-designed with the question of whether it
> regresses performance when it is turned off. Those are severable
> issues, meriting separate discussion (and probably separate threads).
The current thread already contains a lot of information about both, so
separating doesn't seem beneficial.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
