Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> That's a good point. So, do we want/need the same for MBCS and ECPG tests?
It would be nice for ECPG. I wasn't even aware of the MBCS stuff - if it
will exercise the unicode sorting which is a little different on Windows
iirc (due to the lack of full native UTF-8 support) it might be a useful
addition, but I wouldn't say it was worth busting a gut over.
Regards, Dave.
