Re: Patch queue triage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Patch queue triage
Date
Msg-id 464C906D.7010509@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch queue triage  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Patch queue triage  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>>
>>     I suppose inserting HOT tuples without index maintenance is useful
>>     even if no
>>     changes to the space allocation is made is useful. It won't get the
>>     space
>>     usage but it would save on index thrashing. But that still implies
>>     all the
>>     code to handle scans, updates, index builds, etc. Those chunks 
>> could be
>>     separated out but you can't commit without them.
>>
>> There are few things that we can separate easily, like CREATE INDEX
>> related changes, VACUUM and VACUUM FULL related changed, space
>> reuse related changes etc. Let me give it a shot.
> 
> Did we ever get a broken up patch for this?

Yes:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00065.php

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch queue triage
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: mb and ecpg regression tests