Re: information_schema vs temp tables (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sequences were not being shown due to the use of lowercase `s`) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject
Re: information_schema vs temp tables (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sequences were not being shown due to the use of lowercase `s`)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've done the above and now withdraw my complaints about this patch.
Excellent, thank you.
> I notice however that the patch seems to have touched only about half a
> dozen of the information_schema views ... shouldn't more of them have
> similar filters?
Probably. I did this mainly as a fix to the .tables view, and added what
appeared to be other logical places, but it's entirely likely that
[almost] all of them need it. I can whip up a new patch based on the
new functions if you haven't done the work already. :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200609181159
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFDsKgvJuQZxSWSsgRAn70AKCwa2jePz+wyJdFqzMvgqjYkRWFDwCeK6s/
TXJAHKinmRYXfT8o8eV1PYc=
=f5vT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
