Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above
Date
Msg-id 460B6FCB.8090907@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above  ("Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> What would a sensible version of libc be to require? I've installed
> debian woody into a chroot, but noticed that the newest gcc it includes
> is 3.0 - which is pretty acient, and might cause trouble with wx
> or pgadmin.
>
> OTOH, debian sarge contains libc 2.3, not 2.2 like woody. I'm not sure
> how many peopel still run distros without libc 2.3...
>
> Any ideas? Do you guys think that compiling wx+pgadmin3 with gcc 3.0
> will work?

No idea - we use 3.4.2 iirc on developer.pgadmin.org, so 3.x is
definitely feasible. Easiest way is to just give it a go!

Regards, Dave.


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: odd explain diagram in head versions
Next
From: svn@pgadmin.org
Date:
Subject: SVN Commit by hiroshi: r6135 - in trunk/pgadmin3/debugger: . include